Local News :

Home   >   News   >   General News   >   201803
Pratt Replies KNUST Lecturer: Mischievous Or More Ignorant Dr Tia?   
 
  << Prev  |  Next >>
 
19-Mar-2018  
Comments ( 10 )     Email    Print
       
 
 
 
 
Related Stories
 
Dr. Richard Tia shows very clearly that his intent is to be mischievous because he deliberately twists my comments and omits essential elements in a futile effort to be logical and / or consistent.

The point I made is that it is regrettable that after more than 50 years of the existence of the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana continues to import solar panels from Germany and elsewhere.

I also insisted that the blame does not lie with the students and academics at the University, but with the various governments we have had, which have refused to adequately provide for research at the university.

It is interesting that Dr. Tia admits that “(my comment) is a serious indictment of a university that was set up to, in the words of Kwame Nkrumah, lead the scientific and technological advancement of Ghana and Africa”.

Given the important role that solar energy can play in the development of Ghana and Africa, isn’t it a huge pity that no matter what Dr. Tia claims the university has done, Ghana continues to import solar panels? One would have thought that the charge to promote the scientific and technological advancement of Ghana would be more meaningful if it led to the production of solar panels locally.

Dr. Tia writes “I am the first to admit that the university has probably not done enough to engage the public on an informed discourse on the mandate of the university and what it has done so far in the discharge of that mandate. But sometimes, there is so much an academic can do”. Wow!

If the university which like all other universities was set up to promote public good, fails to inform the very public about what it has done to achieve its mandate, who takes the flack? Members of the public like me who comment on the apparent lack of achievement or the likes of Dr. Tia who have failed to give us the relevant information?

He suggests that there is a disconnect between research and development and that the disconnect justifies the lack of development which finds expression in the non-production of solar panels in Ghana.

Again is it not reasonable to expect that our universities would be interested in building the links between research and development. What is the point of research if it does not lead to concrete improvements in the way we do things?

I salute many academics who have worked so hard to bring about meaningful and positive change in the lives of the Ghanaian people.

These academics would include Professor Akilagpa Sawyerr, former Vice Chancellor of the University of Ghana who has used his expert knowledge in law to negotiate several international agreements entered into by governments of Ghana, Professor Allotey whose contribution to the development of mathematics is phenomenal, Dr. Konotey Ahorlu, one of the world’s best research scientists who has contributed significantly to an understanding of the sickle cell disease, Professor Francis Nkrumah a research scientist at the Noguchi Memorial Institute and Dr. Yao Graham, a respected activist on issues regarding mining and trade.

Dr. Tia reveals his orientation and level of commitment to the national project when he writes “if the British are prepared to give me a million pounds sterling to do research on heterogeneous catalysis that is what I will do, whether it would benefit my country directly or not”. Need I comment?

Perhaps, Dr. Tia needs to be reminded that the university of Science and Technology was established with tax payer funds extracted from people, a large majority of whom “cannot define an atom”.

The fact that we may not be able to define an atom does not exclude us from commenting on the work of public universities set up to promote our collective interest. Yes, we may not be able to split or define atoms but we are entitled to express concerns about the use of knowledge of atoms to create weapons of mass destruction.

This academic arrogance is clearly unacceptable.

 
 
Source: Kwesi Pratt, Jnr - Managing Editor, Insight Newspaper
 
 

Comments ( 10 ): Post Your Comments >>

 
 
 
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority.