Home   >   Politics   >   Politics   >   201306
Tabulation Of Election Results – IDEG Calls For Reforms
 
<< Prev  |  Next >>
 
09-Jun-2013  
Comments ( 0 )     Email    Print
       
 
 
 
 
Related Stories
 
The Institute for Democratic Governance has called for reforms on the way election results are tabulated in many African countries.

According to the institute, there have been some improvements in the way elections are organised particularly casting of votes, but said when it comes to tabulation, there was still more room for improvement.

It said many election disputes on the continent in recent times have bordered on tabulation and not necessarily on the casting of votes.

The Executive Director of IDEG, Dr Emmanuel Akwetey made the call when he shared his perspectives on regional integration with a group of journalists from West Africa, as part of a training programme organised by the Deutsche Welle Akademie in Accra.

Dr Akwetey cited the Nigerian and Kenyan elections of 2007 and said there were serious problems with the tabulation of results.

He said the Nigeria elections of 2007 was bad and that the electoral commission did what it was not supposed to do but said the 2011 one was better organised, transparent and credible.

There were issues with how tabulation was done in Ghana as well in the 2012 elections hence the election petition which was pending at the Supreme Court, he said.

“Going forward, one of the areas African elections would have to focus on is in the tabulation. A lot of attention would be needed there. It should engage the next phase of the struggle of reform on the continent”.

“You see voting takes place at the polling stations, the total of polling stations define constituencies, so looking at what is happening in one polling station does not tell you the full story”

He said results from polling stations ought to be sent to a centre where it is added up finally and somebody declared a winner.

“I think that process has a lot of flaws and so it marred the results (Nigeria 2007) because in far away in the states, a lot of things were alleged to have happened“.

Dr Akwetey however maintained that in general, the conduct of the elections; people queuing, voting, the peace around it, the determination and making sure that the right thing was done for everybody happens except that, after the votes are counted and ballot papers are being moved to tabulation centres for additions, that is where things happen.

He said when it comes to voting his observation in the recent Kenyan elections showed that Kenyans are very exceptional, better than Ghanaian voters.

“Look, Ghanaian voters are very impatient when you delay a little… the Kenyans deal with themselves with so much respect and gentility. When they had done such a good job, when it got to tabulation, all their equipment collapsed”.

He said between the returning officer and what was happening in constituencies, there was a whole space, so that integrity of the returning officer was not enough to guarantee that the right thing would be done at every stage to declaring final results.

And so a lot of attention would be needed there, he stated.

Touching on the role of civil society and observer groups, Dr Akwetey said it has been noted that during elections, many observers concentrate more on voting during the day and that at night when the results are being tabulated many of them get exhausted and are unable to follow proceedings properly.

Going forward, we are proposing to divide observer groups into two, so that one can observe during the day while voting is underway and the other can concentrate on the tabulation, he said.

On how different African countries have been peer-reviewing their elections, he said Ghana has been organising its elections in a way that has generally been improving and setting standards on the continent.

He said the standards are high and also as part of the integration, election observation has also provided a way of doing peer review and standardising democratic regimes.

“After the Nigerian elections one of the important things that was set in Nigeria by civil society was to monitor voting and tabulation thereby setting up the civil society election situation room where monitoring is coordinated.

He said because of what happened in the Nigerian elections and the improvements later on, credibility was restored and it influenced what happened in Monrovia.
 
 
 
Source: Enoch Darfah Frimpong / Graphic.com.gh
 
 

Comments ( 0 ): Post Your Comments >>

 
 
 
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority.