Home   >   News   >   General News   >   201111
Supreme Court Throws Out Jake's Case   
 
  << Prev  |  Next >>
 
10-Nov-2011  
Comments ( 0 )     Email    Print
       
 
 
 
National Chairman of the opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP), Jake Obetsebi-Lamptey
 
 
Related Stories
 
The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously dismissed a preliminary objections raised by Mr Jake Obetsebi-Lamptey, Chairman of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), quizzing its jurisdiction to hear a case brought against him by two Ministers of state.

The nine member panel ruled that the Supreme Court had the jurisdiction to hear the matter in which Dr Kofi Omane Boama and Mr Smuel Okudzeto Ablakwa are challenging Mr Obetsebi-Lamptey’s right to purchase a government bungalow he occupied when he was a minister of state.

Mr Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, now a Deputy Minister of Information and Dr Edward Kofi Omane Boamah, now Deputy Minister of Environment, Science and Technology, , in the latter part of 2008 sued the Attorney-General, the Chairman of the Lands Commission and the Chief Registrar of Lands at the Lands Title Registry for allocating the property to Mr Obetsebi-Lamptey.

Mr Obetsebi-Lamptey contended that the matter before the court was bordered on the sale of land as such the legal action should commence from the High Court.

He said the plaintiffs ought to apply to the Commission for Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) if they thought he was abusing his office by applying to purchase the bungalow.
The two deputy ministers argued that the Supreme Court had the jurisdiction to hear the matter since it also bordered on constitutionality.

The panel presided over Mr Willaim A Atuguba stated that a date would be fixed for hearing of the substantive matter.
Other members of the panel include Mr Justice Stephen Allan Brobbey, Ms Justice Sophia Akuffo. Ms Justice Rose Owusu, Ms Justice Sophia Adiniyira, Mr Justice Jone Victor Dotse, Mr Justice B.T Aryeetey, Mr Justice Paul Baffoe-Bonney and Mrs Justice Vida Akoto- Bamfo.

In the writ invoking the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, the applicants prayed the court to declare that by virtue of articles 20(5), 23, 257, 258, 265, 284 and 296 of the 1992 Constitution, the Minister for Water Resources, Works and Housing in the previous government, did not have the power to direct the sale, disposal or transfer of any government or public land to Mr Obetsebi-Lamptey or any other person or body under any circumstances whatsoever.

The applicants also prayed the court to order that any such direction for the disposal, sale or outright transfer of the said property in dispute or any other public land to Mr Obetsebi-Lamptey was illegal and unconstitutional.

The plaintiffs were seeking a declaration that by virtue of articles 20(5), 23, 257, 258, 265, 284 and 296 of the 1992 Constitution, the government was obliged to retain and continue to use, in the public interest, the property in dispute.
They are also seeking a further declaration that the purported sale of the said government bungalow, located at St Mungo Street, Ridge, Accra, by the previous government to Mr Obetsebi-Lamptey was in utter contravention of articles 20(5), 23, 257, 258, 265, 284 and 296 of the 1992 Constitution.

According to the plaintiffs, the Supreme Court should order that the purported direction by the then Minister for Water Resources, Works and Housing, for the disposal, sale or outright transfer of the said property in dispute to Mr Obetsebi-Lamptey smacked of cronyism, was arbitrary, capricious, discriminatory and a gross abuse of the discretionary power vested in a public officer under the 1992 Constitution.

The plaintiffs are praying the court to declare that a publication by the Chairman of the Lands Commission and the Chief Registrar of Lands, which announced that the said property had been allocated to Mr Obetsebi-Lamptey was unconstitutional, void and must be struck out as such, since it was in contravention of articles 20(5), 23, 257, 258, 265, 284 and 296 of the 1992 Constitution.

Furthermore, the plaintiffs are praying for an order of perpetual injunction to restrain the Chairman of the Lands Commission and the Chief Registrar of Lands and their agents “from perfecting the registration of a parcel of land designated as Parcel No 29, Block 12, Section 019, in extent 1.04 acres more or less, as delineated on Registry Map No 003/019/1998, on which is situated Republic of Ghana Bungalow No 2, located at St Mungo Street, Ridge, Accra, in the name of Hon Jake Obetsebi-Lamptey”.

A statement of case accompanying the writ said Mr Obetsebi-Lamptey allocated onto himself the Government bungalow in dispute as his duty post and resided at the said duty post at a huge cost to the state from 2001 to 2008, although he resigned from his public office some time in 2007 to pursue his presidential ambition.

It said in 2001, when Mr Obetsebi-Lamptey was the Chief of Staff at the Presidency, the head office of the Public Works Department carried out, at his behest, renovation to the tune of GH˘17,254 “through Brockwell Construction & Engineering Limited, not to mention further additional refurbishment carried out at his instance to his taste at extraordinary expense to that state”.

According to the statement of case, Mr Obetsebi-Lamptey subsequently applied to the Chairman of the Lands Commission and the Chief Registrar of Lands for a land title certificate to effectuate what it termed “the illegal and unconstitutional transaction”.

It said the Chairman of the Lands Commission and the Chief Registrar of Lands took the above steps to regularise the grant to Mr Obetsebi-Lamptey a land certificate in relation to the said property to effectuate the purported sale of the said government bungalow and plot to him.

According to the statement, the applicants wrote to the then Attorney-General, protesting the sale of the said bungalow, but the Attorney-General replied and pointed out that the matter was a constitutional issue.

They further argued that the then Minister for Water Resources, Works and Housing, did not have the power to “direct the sale, disposal or transfer of any government or public land to Mr Obetsebi-Lamptey or any person or body under such circumstances and that any such direction for the disposal, sale or outright transfer of the said property in dispute or any other public land to Mr Obetsebi-Lamptey was illegal and unconstitutional”.
 
 
Source: GNA
 
 

Comments ( 0 ): Post Your Comments >>

 
 
 
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority.
 
 
Featured Video