A Ghanaian businessman is challenging the legibility of former President John Mahama to stand for elections in his bid to ultimately win the presidential election in Ghana.
Stephen Agyeman is praying the High Court to declare that Mr Mahama, in raising funds to support his bid to be elected as a flagbearer/presidential candidate of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) in his capacity as a former President of the Republic of Ghana violates Article 68 (2) of the 1992 Constitution.
A declaration that the defendant in raising funds to support his bid to be elected as a flagbearer/presidential candidate of the NDC in his capacity as a former President of the Republic of Ghana, without the permission of Parliament, had contravened Article 68 (2) of the 1992 Constitution.
He is further praying the court to hold that former President Mahama’s establishment of a campaign office for the purpose of seeking to co-ordinate his activities in his quest to become flagbearer/presidential candidate of the NDC constitutes an office of emolument or profit within the context of Article 68 (2) of the 1992 Constitution and same having been established without Parliamentary permission was in contravention of Article 68 (2) of the 1992 Constitution.
Another declaration that pursuant to Articles 66 (1) and 66 (2) of the 1992 Constitution, the defendant was not qualified as a candidate to stand for re-election as President of the Republic of Ghana on the ticket of the NDC is also being sought by the plaintiff.
Emoluments
A declaration that the defendant’s act of seeking to be elected presidential candidate of the NDC was in breach of Article 66 (1) and 66 (2) of the 1992 Constitution on account of the fact that the defendant had had the benefits and emoluments of an ex-president twice and thus a third attempt was in violation of the letter and spirit of Article 66 (1) and 66 (2) of the 1992 Constitution.
Additionally, the plaintiff wants the court to declare that pursuant to Articles 68 (2), 68 (3), 68 (4), 68 (5), 68 (7) and 68 (9) of the 1992 Constitution, the former President Mahama cannot purport to seek re-election as President of the Republic of Ghana.
A legal practitioner, Mr Simon Okyere filed the writ of summons on behalf of the plaintiff in Accra on Friday, February 15, 2019.
Statement of Claim
According to the statement of claim accompanying the writ of summons, the plaintiff was a citizen of Ghana seeking to protect the constitution of the Republic.
It said the defendant left office as President of the Republic following his defeat as President on the January 7, 2017.
The plaintiff is arguing that the defendant upon leaving office after losing the 2016 presidential election to President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, began to enjoy all the privileges and curtsies of a former President pursuant to Article 68 (4) of the 1992 Constitution.
The statement of claim said the defendant filed his nomination papers to contest the presidential primaries of the NDC to be elected as its presidential candidate to contest the national presidential elections in the year 2020.
According to the plaintiff, the defendant in furtherance of his ambition to be elected as the presidential candidate of the NDC “has established a campaign team with a campaign office for his personal gain, advantage, profit, or benefit of becoming the presidential candidate of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) for the 2020 presidential elections.”
Source: Daily Graphic
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority. |
This businessman just want to waste his money instead of donating that money to charity. So he mean to say Mahama does not know the Laws governing the position he is seeking for? This npp people are a bit du+mp to the core.
The worse to happen to mahama is not yet ready, the luut that took place under his watch will be expose before 2020, that will be the real nailing of mahama
Well to start with, I think this case is dead on arrival. It is a diversionary tactics employed by the opponents of HE John Dramani Mahama to change the minds of the delegates who will in anyway vote overwhelmingly for him. Why do you and your council file a matter of constitutional interpretation at a high court? Even an shs student with no knowledge in law knows that matters of constitutional interpretation is for the supreme courts. They just want to waste his time. This is a clear sign of things that will come before his 2020 victory.
One good thing about democracy is how it allows freedom of speech and freedom to seek redress from the courts when one is not comfortable with any clause or contravention of same in the Constitution. Some of these clauses are so intricate that even lawyers have to on debate them to map the way forward. In Ghana, the Supreme court is available to interpret the Constitution to the fullest when the need arises and they are approached. Ii is my strong belief that they will do justice to this case.
MY FRIEND TAKE THIS CASE TO THE HAGUE WE WILL VOTE ON THE 23RD.OF FEB.2019.CHILD OF SATAN.WHEN WE ARE WAITING FOR JDM TO RESCUE AND REDEEM US FROM TERRANIC INCOMPETENT NANA ADDO AND NPP GOVT.YOU WANT TO STOP US. YOU LIE BAD
This is a sign that John mahama will surely become president again. People are so jealous about him to the extent that any fuuuulish man want to find something to nail him.
Please I am not a lawyer but read the constitution carefully before disgracing yourself in a court of law.