Petitioner in the ongoing election 2020 petition at the Supreme Court, John Dramani Mahama has filed an application at the Apex Court of the land, seeking to stop the hearing of his own petition he filed 22 days ago on 30 December 2020.
According to the motion on notice for stay of proceedings filed today (21 January) and expected to be moved on Tuesday (26 January 2021), which is the same date the Supreme Court is to resume sitting of the substantive petition, Mahama says he has been advised by his lawyers and believe that the Application for Review of the Supreme Court decision that dismissed their application for interlocutories, is based on certain fundamental errors of law that the Court made in its ruling, leading to a miscarriage of justice.
“At the hearing of this application, counsel will crave the indulgence of the Court to refer to the statement of Case in support of the Application for Review, particularly to show that there are indeed serious matters of law that are to be determined in this review application, and I am likely to succeed, as the Ruling of the Court is manifestly in error” the application stated.
“In the meantime, certain Orders in respect of issues for trial and steps for the hearing of my Petition have been made by the Court on 20 January 202102, including orders that we file our Witness Statements by noon, 21 January 2021.
Mahama further noted in his latest application that he has again been advised by his lawyers and believe that:
a. Discovery processes, such as interrogatories, are normal pre-trial processes to limit the scope or a trial, and the review application will seek to recognize the right to have recourse to them,
b. In this particular case, the use of the mechanism of interrogatories will ensure a speedier trial;
c. The denial to us of leave to serve interrogatories is a serious miscarriage of justice which we expect to have remedied in the Review;
d. For the hearing of the Petition to proceed before the Review is heard would cause irreparable harm to the conduct of our case, since I would have been denied the benefit of normal pre-trial” the application further stated.
Mahama concludes his application by indicating that “all the above constitute exceptional circumstances on the basis of which we respectfully seek orders of the Court staying the proceedings in this case until the determination of the Application for Review. Not to stay proceedings would create the unfortunate impression that the review application has been pre-determined. No prejudice will be caused to the Respondents by the grant of such leave”.
Source: Wilberforce Asare/ Asaase Radio
|Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority.|