<<Print>>

Kwamena Duncan, a former Minister for Central Region, has replied former Supreme Court Justice, Justice William Atuguba on his criticism of the Supreme Court's judgment in the case of the Assin North legislator, Gyakye Quayson.

Speaking at a public lecture held on Tuesday, October 24, 2023, the retired Supreme Court Judge described the court's decision as "scandalous".

"The James Gyakye Quayson's decision by the Supreme Court is with all due respect scandalous in that the court, in the teeth of the settled maxim Res Judicata et non quieta movere, re adjudicated the same matter that has been adjudicated upon by the High court on the merits", he said.

He continued; "The Supreme Court does not stand in good light with all due respect in disqualifying Gyakye Quayson, despite his clear certificate of renunciation of his Canadian citizenship as from 26th November 2020 whereas the elections were on December 7. I am not able to see substantial justice in this."

"If the certificate of renounciation is so mandatory and conclusive why was it not conclusive in its effect to qualify Gyakye Quason when he received it, dated 26th November 2020, whereas the parliamentary election was held on 7th December 2020? Statutes, judgements, and documents must always be applied with consistency both in the letter and spirit. These must always be construed holistically and as instruments of justice since it is a well-settled principle that the duty of a court is to do justice and a court should not be turned away from doing justice," he added.

Critiquing these statements by Justice Atuguba, Kwamena Duncan, on Peace FM's "Kokrokoo" programme Wednesday morning, accused the former Supreme Court Judge of doing the bidding of the opposition National Democratic Congress.

"It is extraterritorial NDC agenda", he exclaimed.

He wondered why Justice Atuguba never raised these concerns until he retired and also cast doubts on the genuineness of his commentaries on the Apex Court's verdict on lawmaker Gyakye Quayson.

Kwamena Duncan said "so, those times, Atuguba could indeed marshall the power of the Judiciary, the power conferred on them, to do what he could do to sentence people for contempt. Today, after leaving the place, there's no real independence. It is all to add to that agenda".

"The real independence, the real separation of powers, the security of tenure of Judges, you are seeing this only after leaving the Supreme Court that while you were in active service, you didn't see those? And who tells you that if you saw them, whilst in active service, you couldn't have said them?", he asked Mr. Atuguba.