Central University Has Not Acted In A Transparent Manner - NUGS

Concerning the dismissal of close to seven hundred (700) first year students of the Central University College (CUC), the National Union of Ghana Students (NUGS) wishes to inform the general public that the University has not acted fairly and failed to disclose vital information to the students as at the time of entering a conditional arrangement to admit the affected students. The CUC knew as at the time of the admission that the entry requirements into all tertiary institutions were as follows: For SSCE Candidates: Passes (A � D) in six subjects comprising three (3) core subjects, including English and Mathematics, and three (3) elective subjects. For WASSCE Candidates: Passes (A1 � C6) in six subjects comprising three (3) core subjects, including English and Mathematics, and three (3) elective subjects. The above directive from the National Accreditation Board (NAB) was communicated to all tertiary institutions on 10th January, 2011. (Find the circular from the NAB attached for your perusal). The CUC cannot deny knowledge of this directive and that it did not have to admit students who had anything more than the stipulated grades above. The CUC entered that arrangement with the students fully aware what the repercussions were. The attempt to shift the post and make it seem like the students are at fault and should therefore face the brunt of a directive which was not new to the CUC, is largely unfair to the students. If CUC had disclosed the directive to the students earlier, they wouldn�t have entered into that arrangement with the school, thereby averting to this bizarre episode. The position of NUGS is a two-pronged approach to solving the matter; NUGS is engaging the NCTE to review its earlier decision on the admission criteria to include D7 and E8. If this agreement is reached, NAB will communicate to the institution to revoke its earlier decision. The other way will be to seek the intervention of the court to compel CUC to go according to the terms of the agreement they reached with the students. We must do this to ensure that students are not made to suffer even when they have entered a contract and have fulfilled their part of the bargain. The law requires that when a party to a contract fulfills his obligations in the contractual agreement he/she must be entitled to his rights. That is the position of the law! Finally, NUGS wishes to call on the Ministry of Education to intervene in the matter with the urgency it deserves.