Former Director-General of the National Development Planning Commission (NDPC), Dr. Nii Moi Thompson has offered free lessons on development planning to member of the National Democratic Congress (NDC), Tony Aidoo following the latter’s attack on former President John Mahama’s 40-year development plan.
According to Dr. Tony Aidoo, ‘the so-called 40-year plan that was developed under the Mahama administration was’ nonsensical since it lacked a database.
“You need data to plan; you look at a community: how many toilets do they have? Potable water availability, how much can we spend to provide those items? What about the neighbourhood community? … All those are matters of data. You don’t plan without data; the so-called 40-year plan that was developed under the Mahama administration was to me, nonsense. How do you plan without data?” the staunch NDC member asked.
Dr. Nii Moi Thompson, in a 3-page response to Dr. Aidoo’s claims, has chided him for not reading John Mahama’s 40-year development plan. He accused Dr. Aidoo of making the claims based on his bitter experiences at the ‘Policy Evaluation and Oversight Unit set up for him at the Presidency by UNDP’.
Below is Dr Thompson's response to Dr. Aidoo's comments:
The following is my response to Tony Aidoo's ill-informed comments about the long-term plan, which appeared on Ghanaweb today.
**
It's doubtful that Dr. Aidoo has seen the plan, much less read it or studied the process of preparing it. And if he is quoted correctly, then he seems to confuse his rather unpleasant experience with the Policy Evaluation and Oversight Unit set up for him at the Presidency by UNDP to compete with NDPC, which is the sole state agency constitutionally mandated to coordinate policy and evaluation at the national and local levels.
At the time, Dr. Aidoo often complained bitterly and publicly about his inability to obtain data from MDAs. There was a reason for that: They were under no legal obligation to share such data with him. NDPC, on the other hand, had no such difficulty, having long established systems for obtaining data from the same MDAs, which are legally required to provide them. NDPC used the data and information from the MDAs to prepare its annual progress reports (APRs), which were submitted to (and continue to be submitted to) the president and parliament.
The fact that Dr. Aidoo failed in getting information from MDAs that refused to submit to the authority of his donor-funded ad hoc office does NOT mean there was no data; there was and there is. Anyone serious about getting "data" on Ghana can easily access any of the annual progress reports, in addition to the large reservoir of data at government sites like GSS, MOF, and BOG, to name but a few. Compared to countries at similar stages of development, Ghana has a fairly good data reservoir and system, although there's always room for improvement.
Perhaps, more importantly, Dr. Aidoo seems to confuse operational (annual/medium-term) plans with a long-term plan, which is more aspirational, a VISION of the future, with high-level targets and strategies and policies for achieving it. You don't have to cost that. Rather, it guides the preparation of the operational plans, which are then costed and budgeted for.
The distinction is not trivial. Nor, out of intellectual double-talk, can we trivialise the importance of long-term planning.
To quote from Kwame Nkrumah's 7-Year Development Plan, the transformation of the Ghanaian economy could only occur over the long term and for that we needed a long-term plan. To fail to plan long term, according to the 7YDP, was to remain "prisoners of our past". And we see evidence of this all around us.
Every major problem we face in Ghana today is the result of our failure to anticipate the future, no matter how imperfectly, and plan for it accordingly. Housing policies, education policies, transportation policies, etc all require a view of the long term, and in particular population growth, levels and distribution.
The 7YDP, for example, was the first to propose free secondary education in 1963 and, on the basis of that, prepare for the construction of more secondary schools. (See quote at the end).
The coup of 1966 ended that plan and placed us on the path of ad hoc development planning, with dire consequences. A story in the 19th September, 1969, issue of the Daily Graphic reported that of the 50,000 students who passed the Common Entrance Exam that year, "only 10,000 .. will be admitted to various secondary schools" because of limited space.
This is exactly what the 7YDP sought to avoid. Yet, nothing was done about it, and we went about our national lives with reckless abandon. More recently, in 2006 or thereabouts, a team of educators appointed to offer solutions to the problem of inadequate space in our secondary schools rather cynically proposed to LIMIT ACCESS to these schools. As a result, government set the pass rate of BECE at no more than 60%, and even then most of those who passed still couldn't get into secondary schools.
It's good that free secondary education was eventually launched in 2017, 54 years after it was first proposed. But the chaos that attended its implementation, the risk of diluting the quality of education as a result of the double-track system to address the problem of inadequate space, and the fact that we have not fully worked out its full implications for national development in the immediate and distant future, is a reminder that we will indeed remain, prisoners of our past, until we boldly face the future and plan for it.
The future will NOT wait for us because someone thinks we don't have data. Others, such as South Korea, did even greater things with less data. We have absolutely no excuse for not planning, data or no data.
Lastly, I must inform Dr. Aidoo that the long-term plan has other associated plans:
1. The Ghana Infrastructure Plan, which, among other things, will ensure that all open gutters are covered by a certain date, every city and town has modern sewage systems, and every community road is paved; provisions for dealing with floods and erosion, addressing the housing deficits, and even anticipating charging stations for the advent of electric cars in Ghana;
2. The Spatial Development Framework, which will rationalise and sanitise human settlements development to prevent the whole country from becoming one huge sprawling slum;
3. A national human resource development policy and strategy to ensure that we provide education and training today according to the projected pace of growth and structure of the Ghanaian economy; and
4. The most comprehensive model of the Ghanaian economy to enrich policy making.
I encourage Dr. Aidoo to study these and the plan proper to get a better sense of what actually transpired and what is at stake.
Nii Moi Thompson, Accra
PS: Quote from Seven-Year Development Plan, 1963/64-1969/70
"It is intended that by the end of the Seven-Year Development Plan secondary education will also have become free".
...
"The estimated large increase in enrolment in secondary schools will require the construction of many more schools. To reduce such capital outlay to its lowest possible levels, every effort
will be made to expand existing schools in preference to building new ones and to construct as many day-secondary schools as possible.
...
"Starting from 1963 school text-books will be supplied free of charge..."
It is important to note that one of the first acts of the NLC was to abolish the free textbooks policy, along with the Plan. The result, of course, is the mess that we find ourselves in today.
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority. |
Give and take is always a fair deal when it is made in a circumstance you know exactly what you lack and seek to get in a fair conceived healthy way. Indeed, that notwithstanding, the teachings of the scriptures will even guide your efforts. This concept could go a long way to commercialize our educational products and Ghana can, in turn, derive multiples gains from it. You see, National Development Plan and the implementation of same is born out of good Leadership embedded in a vision devoid of personal and political gains. Not necessarily by the voluminous academic blueprints. But sectorial, practical, and prudent policies can also do the big shots. Paramount to good Leadership, is your genuine desire, determination and Statesmanship you reserve to serve your people so as to achieve the best benefits for their welfare. So far, I believe the Ministry of Education is not doing badly at all and all reflect the good Leadership. Thus, being able or having the capability to choose at your disposal qualified and competent personnel to bring your vision to a tangible reality. I would solemnly appeal to Ghanaians irrespective of their political beliefs not to insult by making personal attacks and using baseless political polemics to inhibit constructive criticism to derail policy credibility. You might find it necessary to accent your vision with big numbers of Ministers and even dissect Transportation into Aviation and Railways but at the end of the day, if these important facilities are at the disposal of the citizenry to make informed choices, the numbers would be immaterial considering our circumstances in terms of having a dire need for these basic social and economic needs. I agree with Dr. Aidoo, for, he is being candid with the Ghana circumstance of lacking scientific database for credible information to make informed Development Plan let alone to rely on it for projections in terms of long-term Development. The present Administration is fixing that deficit.
"It's good that free secondary education was eventually launched in 2017, 54 years after it was first proposed. But the chaos that attended its implementation, the risk of diluting the quality of education as a result of the double-track system to address the problem of inadequate space, and the fact that we have not fully worked out its full implications for national development in the immediate and distant future, is a reminder that we will indeed remain, prisoners of our past, until we boldly face the future and plan for it". Good point but whose child should stay at home if we take away the double track? Dr Nii Moi all in all you are brilliant
My brother, seriously speaking there are some people or commentators on this platform you just ignore or don't pay any attention to. It is just like telling a piece of "rock" to listen to wisdom........no matter how hard or loud you shout result will be the same....So just leave them to wallow in their ignorance or illiteracy.
Instead of looking at the substance of the debate, you are superficially politicising the issue.Ghana oh Ghana, how can we develop with such brains.
Instead of looking at the substance of the debate, you are superficially politicising the issue.Ghana oh Ghana, how can we develop with such brains.
Dr Tony Aidoo bemoaned access to Data and he was right. Isn't Dr Nii Moi Thomson ashamed to suggest that if you want data you can find them in progress docs. That's shameful and unintellectual. In a modern society, data that is used for planning live in robust databases and not files. He was one of the guys who always thought he had economics on his fingers but just book-long jumpy.
I DO NOT ENJOY COMMENTING ON ANOTHER PERSON'S COMMENT MADE BY A CONTRIBUTOR ON THIS PLATFORM. HOWEVER, IT IS SOMETIMES PAINFUL BUT NECESSARY TO DRAW OTHERS TO ISSUES THAT THEY COMMENT ON WHICH EXPOSE THEIR ILL-INFORMRD POSITIONS ON ISSUES. LONG TERM DEVELOPMENT PLANS THAT CAN BE EXECUTED GENUINELY AND HOLEHEARTEDLY ARE THE BEST FOR EVERY NATION IRRESPECTIVE OF THEIR POSITIONS AS DEVELOPED OR DEVELOPING NATIONS. FOR EXAMPLE, IF IN A LONG TERM DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SAY THE HEALTH SECTOR IT IS IN THE PLAN THAT BY THE YEAR 2038 FROM TODAY 2018 70 PER CENT OF ALL HEALTH POSTS AND HEALTH CENTRES IN GHANA SHOULD GRADUATE TO BECOME POLYCLINICS MANNED BY AT LEAST SIX QUALIFIED MEDICAL DOCTORS, CAN WE SAY THAT THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS USE*LESS IF ALL GOVERNMENTS WOULD ADHERE TO THE PLAN AND WORK TO ACHIEVE IT? EMPHATICALLY NO. PLEASE I BEG LET US ALWAYS READ CLEARLY INTO ISSUE BEFORE WE MAKE OUR ILL-INFORMED CRITICISMS AND COMENTS BECUSE THOSE COMMENTS MAY MAKE US LAUGHING STOCK.
WE ARE INDEED, "PRISONERS OF OUR PAST". WE NEED A DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM THAT HAS STRATEGIES TO CONTINUE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS. OTHERWISE WE WASTE OUR LIVES BY INSTABILITY OF PROJECTS. DOES OUR CURRENT FOUR-YEAR TERM IN OFFICE HELP THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE COUNTRY? WE MAY NEED TO ADJUST POLICIES TO ACCOMMODATE DEVELOPMENT NEEDS OF THE NATION.
Long english kwa. Tony Aidoo says it is .........
This is just a book long response..... The 40 yrs devt plan is non.s.ense. simple.... From your own NDC member. These (P)NDC people have just waisted our time as a country. They only came to enrich themselves. Now you are fighting among yourselves. Incompetent greedy NDC th.i.e.ves.