Retired State Attorney, Ellen Kwakukume is demanding a public retraction and an apology from the Member of Parliament for Assin Central Kennedy Agyapong and Salis Newspaper for deliberately distorting audiovisual images to tarnish her reputation.
Mrs. Kwawukume in a statement said Kennedy Agyapong and Salis Newspaper took bits and pieces of an earlier video recording to create an erroneous impression to further a campaign against investigative journalist Anas Aremeyaw Anas.
Kennedy Agyapong and the Salis Newspaper produced a video documentary titled “Who watches the watchman” which sought to project journalist Anas Aremeyaw Anas as a corrupt person who demanded bribes to exonerate people he had investigated and found to be corruption.
The sequence of the video suggested that Ellen Kwakukume demanded and received a bribe from Anas Aremeyaw Anas to stop pursuing a case against people’s whose interest Anas was serving.
But Mrs. Kwakukume said the impression created by Kennedy Agyapong and Salis Newspaper was false.
She is, therefore, demanding an apology from the two parties within seven days and issue a public retraction of the claims to clear her name from the negative impression created.
Read her letter below:
Re: Alleged Acts of Corruption Leveled Against The Person of Ellen C. Kwakukume by Kennedy Agyapong and Salis Newspaper Limited.
Demand for Retraction and Apology
My attention has been drawn to the following acts and comments made by you Mr. Kennedy Agyapong and The Salis Newspaper:
- Upload and circulation of videos on social media and public airing of said videos at KenCity, Madina on the 28th of June 2018 containing Anas Aremeyaw Anas and me.
- As a prelude to the airing of the video mentioned above and in some further video interviews you granted various media outlets before the airing, you Kennedy Agyapong said that the video shows a public prosecutor, who is deceased, demanding and collecting a bribe from Anas Aremeyaw Anas. You further went on to say that in view of the $5,000 bribe, you alleged I received, I failed to attend court sittings and generally failed to pursue the suit, resulting in the case being dismissed on the 13th of October 2013.
- Captioning and superimposing a voice narrative on the video that seeks to create the impression I was demanding a bribe and conspiring to tamper with the court process.
In the said video I saw portions of a pretrial meeting I had with Anas Aremeyaw Anas sometime in the year 2009 pertaining to the case:
The Republic
vs.
1. Mohammed Hafix Abdullah
2.Mubarak Seidu
3. Prince Kinston Kwame (at large).
I want to provide you with a bit of background information on this case since your investigations were too shoddy even to ascertain if I was alive or not. The said case was assigned to me on or about the 2nd of October 2009 in the course of my work as a prosecuting attorney in the service of the Attorney General’s Department. After a perusal of the docket, I asked for further investigations and after that took the case to court on or about the 11th day of May 2010. The case was presided over by Justice Quist. Three dates were given for a day to day hearings, the 12th, 13th and 14th of May 2010. The complainant failed to turn up in court on all days. It was alleged that the accused persons had threatened him with juju if he shows up in court. Whatever his reason for not showing up, it fueled agitations by the accused persons to be discharged since the complainant had failed to turn up for the start of the case.
To save the case I decided to call Anas Aremeyaw Anas to give his evidence since it was his investigation which led to the arrest in the first place and this information could help our case.
When it got to the tendering of the video he made in the course of his investigation, the counsels for the accused persons raised objections. Arguments were taken by the court on the 23rd of June 2010, 12th of July 2010, 29th of July 2010, 26th of August 2010 and the court set the 10th of September 2010 for a ruling to be given. The court failed to give its ruling on the 10th of September, and the case was adjourned to the 27th of September 2010. The case was subsequently adjourned to these days by the presiding judge, without tangible reasons: 8/10/2010, 18/10/2010, 28/10/2010, 30/11/2010, 18/1/2011, 1/2/2011, 14/2/2011, 21/2/2011, 7/4/2011, 4/5/2011, 18/5/2011, 31/5/2011, 28/6/2011 and 14/7/2011. All without the judge giving his ruling. In all, the prosecution attended court over 20 times on this case. I had finished my case and was waiting for a ruling from Justice Quist. Maybe the delays were the initial basis for Anas to investigate the judicial system later on.
In the interim, I attained the age of 60. I applied to proceed on retirement and handed over the case to another attorney around the end of July 2011 as directed. The 14th of July 2011 was the last date I attended court on this case. I retired at the end of July 2011, over two clear years before your alleged date of the dismissal of the case on 11th of October 2013.
My reply to your allegations of corruption are these: Does this factual narrative of what transpired show I did not want to prosecute the case? Your video to back your claims against me has been edited from a recording of a pretrial meeting that spanned several hours. Furthermore, the narrative and opinions added seek to paint a picture of wrongdoing. In one such narrative, you captioned a scene: “tell me the amount transferred to me” however anyone listening with a clear mind will hear what I actually said. Which was: “tell me the amount transferred to him.” I urge all to take a careful relisten and download copies of the original video. Despite your criminal attempts to doctor the narrative, you botched that part. I thank my God.
I have never had a dollar account. I challenge you to provide proof of that account and even entreat any bank that has my dollar account to provide you with that information.
The allegation that I failed to attend court sittings leading to the dismissal of the case against the accused persons is very false. I retired over two clear years before the said 11th October 2013 that you alleged the case was dismissed because of my failure to attend court to prosecute the case.
My observation is that you deliberately took bits and pieces of the recording out of context to create a very erroneous impression aimed at furthering your campaign against Anas, bolstered by the wrong impression that I was dead and cannot put up a defense.
I demand a public retraction of your allegations and an apology within seven days from the date of this demand. You are entreated to put in as much effort to clear my name as you did in tarnishing my reputation.
Ellen C. Kwawukume
_________
1st July 2018
Source: Ellen C. Kwawukume
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Peacefmonline.com. Peacefmonline.com accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content. Please report any inappropriate content to us, and we will evaluate it as a matter of priority. |
I didn't hear the video has been edited as purported by certain people and it means Ana's was in the video.
Madam state attorney was this statement by you said in a vacuum?...and I quote "all of us want money" to which the man in the video responded 'exactly'. You continued "do you have evidence? The reply was yes. You went on to say that you can tune yours to match his. Madam, what does that mean? My umderstanding of 'tuning' in that context is to alter whatever you have to agree with his. The truth is only one and cannot be turned around no matter who tries to. It remains static and cannot be changed. As for your alleged voice over of 'him' to 'me', the specialists in the nation's security services can establish whether there was a cut and paste for which that would be criminal on the part of the video presenters. The nation needs to know the truth but then you need to provide answers to questions that I have raised. The nation is being torn apart by this expose' but we need to move on. Ken would also have to tell us how many times the case were adjourned, the reasons and why he said you were deceased, that is if you are the lady in the video.
1.She was the prosecutor. 2. Anas was 'her' witness(investigator). 3. She had a pretrial(rehearsal) session with Anas as to how they were going to present their case in court. How was she to bring the accused in a pretrial? Does it make any sense? Lawyers meet with their clients to practise how they are going to present their cases in court. Do they include the opponents too in their rehearsals? SMH. I THINK THE RAW VIDEO MATERIAL SHOULD BE USED RATHER TO KNOW THE FACTS.
This woman is rather implicating herself and Anas. In Ghana the official investigating body is the CID.If indeed you were conducting a pretrial why did you not involved the CID,the judge and the lawyers of Hafiz,Mubarak and rather call Anas a private investigator?.You are just repeating Anas master Kwaku Baako's statement on the radio platforms. Very soon COP Adu Poku will come out with the real event leading to the whole case.Your statement we all like money, tell every rational Ghanaian the logical meaning.
Hoooooooooo!!!!! awi ooooo awi, this woman is a disgrace to all women ei!! "professional ***barred word***"
This woman have no shame, she is corroborating what Kwaku Baako has been going from one radio station to another, saying it was a pretrial. My questions are.Was Anas the offender?.Why the lawyers for Hafiz and Mubarak were not in the pretrial. Why the judge in the case was not involved int he said pretrial. Why do you say we all want money and Anas responded exactly. It is better for you to let sleeping dos lie and enjoy your retirement. We are not ***barred word***, we all have conscience like you.
People can lie ooo, heerrr. I have just listened and watched the video again, please this your explanation is laughable. Ghanaians are wise ooo. you asked if your $5000 had been transferred into your account. pre trial conference indeed!
I apologize to you madam because I watched some, but please were you the one in the video?, if yes, then you don't need any apology rather you need to be arrested for conspiracy and abetment to commit crime, which you did per the court judge decision in 2013.